Sunday, September 09, 2007

How Far We Have Come

Well The world certainly has improved as we are on the Eve of the 6th anniversary of 911 CHOKE!!!
Zogby Poll:
51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment
67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of
World Trade Center 7

Why Bush Can Get Away with Attacking Iran
Many people in the antiwar movement try to reassure themselves: Bush cannot possibly attack Iran. He does not have the means to do so, or, perhaps, even he is not foolish enough to engage in such an enterprise. Various particular reasons are put forward, such as: If he attacks, the Shiites in Iraq will cut the US supply lines. If he attacks, the Iranians will block the Straits of Ormuz or will unleash dormant terrorist networks worldwide. Russia won't allow such an attack. China won't allow it -- they will dump the dollar. The Arab world will explode.

The REAL Rudy: Command Center

Who is Pat Robertson really? Is he a man of God or a man of sin
Looking Behind the Fa├žade

Osama bin Laden: The Newest Fake

Bush Supresses "Impeach Bush" Press conference
While the momentum for the Sept. 15 Peace/Impeachment demonstration grows, the Bush Administration is going to extraordinary lengths to suppress the mobilizing for this mass demonstration. Less than 18 hours ago, National Park Service Police turned a September 15 Press Conference, held in front of the White House, into a chaotic scene. On the pretext that there was no permit for a three foot long folding table that the media placed their microphones on, the police intervened in the middle of the press conference to announce that it was an unpermitted activity. Three people were arrested and are still being held in jail. They include Adam Kokesh, an Iraq war veteran; Tina Richards of Grassroots America; and Ian Thompson an ANSWER Coalition organizer. The Parks Police even rode a horse directly into the crowd of reporters and shocked onlookers. The National Parks Police is an agency in the Interior Department whose Secretary is a member of George W. Bush's cabinet. In recent weeks September 15 organizers have been fined more than $30,000 for putting up posters promoting the September 15 March on Washington.

Nationally Recognized Engineers and Scientist Call for New 9/11 Investigation
Over the last 8 weeks a world renowned scientist and three nationally recognized engineers have called for a new investigation of 9/11, yet none of these have been reported in the mainstream media.
Most recently, on Sept. 4, Joel S. Hirschhorn, Ph.D., who served for 12 years as a Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and later as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources for the National Governors Association, called for a new investigation of 9/11, saying "First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions." Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11
On Aug. 27, Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., member of the National Academy of Sciences and world renowned scientist, characterized the official account of 9/11 as "a fraud" and called for a new investigation, "I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken." National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation
An Aug. 21 article reported that James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division, called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable." Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
On July 16, J. Marx Ayres, former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council and former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission called for a new investigation of 9/11, "Steven Jones' call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned 'cutter-charges' must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out." Former California Seismic Safety Commissioner Endorses 9/11 Truth Movement
Additionally, this week, Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot, questioned the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. "When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story." U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11
The mainstream media has not covered any of these stories. Please help disseminate this critically important information.

!!!!!!NORTHCOM Plans 5 Day Martial Law Exercise!!!!!

The United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) has just announced plans for an anti-terrorism exercise called Vigilant Shield 08. The exercise which is slated to run from October 15th to October 20th is described as a way to prepare, prevent and respond to any number of national crises. The exercise is simply a test case scenario for the implementation of martial law. Although the description of the exercise is disturbing, USNORTHCOM also announced that they are more prepared for a natural disaster and a terrorist attack after they used their response to Hurricane Katrina as a test laboratory. During Hurricane Katrina, authorities violated the constitutional rights of citizens by stealing people’s firearms and even relocating people against their will. These announcements are incredibly disturbing on a number of levels as the nature of Vigilant Shield 08 and the admission that Hurricane Katrina was used as a test laboratory shows that the government is actively preparing the military and government institutions for martial law.

Local activities planned to remember the 6th Anniversary of 9/11
In Durham At Duke:
We are going to be on the Bryan Center Plaza by the Duke Chapel from 11-4 PM Tuesday, then there will a follow-up lecture/movie on Wednesday, Social Sciences Auditorium, Duke West Campus, 7-10 PM. Please post where appropriate.

In Raleigh: Raleigh Capitol Building All Day
Join the Raleigh 911 Truth Group for a September 11 Truth Vigil and bring your signs expressing 9/11 Truth. Where: Raleigh Capitol Building. When: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 7:00 AM - 10:00 AM at Edenton Street at the History Museum, 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM for a group walk around the Capitol Building, and 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM at Morgan and Fayetteville Streets. Contact Us:


Anonymous said...

Thanks for keeping us posted on the Happenings of the NorthCom unit!!

Anonymous said...

My Dear Fellow Honest 9/11 Truthers:

The only way to find out whether or not Bush's repeated (12/4/01
and 1/5/02) remarkable incriminating 9/11 witness statements
amount to the most serious loose-lips-sink-ships statements in
the history of the world is for us to raise the issue by
publicly asking the questions and pressing for answers.

Our collective failure to do so is inexcusable! The 911truth
movement is apparently being misled. I sure hope I'm wrong
about this, but if Tuesday's D.C. rally comes and goes without
any 911truth "luminaries" publicly asking how Bush could have
seen the 1st WTC impact on TV, as he's repeatedly stated, long
before the only *known* video of that event was available, then
we will have blown our last good naturally occurring calendar
opportunity to question Bush's confessions, and to turn up the
heat on the conniving Dems to turn up the heat on Bush. Isn't
this a perfect time to raise the obvious but never-asked
questions about Bush's confession statements?

No one (are you reading this, Bob Bowman?) need accuse Bush
of anything -- just simply ask how his repated statements are
possible, what channel Bush was turned to, who he made his
"terrible pilot" comment to, what view the camera offered,
etc. If those of us who are aware of Bush's statements never
ask the qustions, how can Americans (many of whom aren't even
aware of his apparent confessions to prior knowledge at the
highest level of the U.S. government) be certain that they do
not have an enemy-in-chief in the White House (and a colluding
fake-opposition party running Congress)?

We have a FOIA response from the military indicating that visual
images were transmitted to the Presidential limousine motorcade
(where Bush was at 8:46, time of the 1st impact) that morning,
so please do not believe _ANYONE_ who tells you that Bush said
"regular TV" (he did NOT) or "ordinary TV" (he did NOT) or that
since the 1st imapct wasn't on any civilian channels that a.m.
that therefore Bush must've been mistaken -- so we can(!?) all
just forget about Bush's remarkable statements, and act as if he
never made them. (As if anyone who's misspoken or been caught
lying enough times is immune from implicating himself in mass
murder and treason.)

Like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid (BAAAAAAAAA!), and all Dems,
and the media, and the alternative media, and every political
science professor in the nation/world, the 911truth movement
has had more than 5.5 years to question Bush's incriminating
statements, but never has. WTF are we all waiting for (or
afraid of), and what kind of obstructionist 'leaders' are these bigwigs, anyway?

How is it possible that all our institutions are corrupt WRT
9/11, but the likes of Webster Tarpley and Jim Hoffman and John
Judge and many others could never possibly come between the
movement and our goal of rapidly vanquishing of The Big Lie?
Especially when they've decided that certain evidence is not to
be considered and pursued? (Plus they keep referring to "the
hijackers" and "the planes" as if everyone knows what is meant
by them, which helps the central, enemy-creation aspect of The
Big Lie remain in full effect.)

I realize that we can thank and depend upon these people for
getting folks to doubt 9/11 as much as we do, but they are
not presenting all the evidence, so the understanding of anyone
who only listens to their flock is not complete; they are
holding us back. They are gatekeepers who'd rather bring up
purported incongruities than actual lie-penetrating evidence
(check out the 911 blimp site for some examples & fact-chk 'em!)

That's why the "big name" 911truth-approved public speakers are
not going to question or even honestly bring up Bush's repeated
voluntary incriminating 9/11 witness stmts on Tuesday. (I'd so
like to be wrong about that, that I'll take wagers, including
from Bowman and Judge who'll be speaking there! C'mon, guys;
take my money, please.)

How can anyone possibly hold a "Rally for Truth, Peace and
Impeachment" near the White House, and lobby Congress, without
reminding the public (and our so-called Representatives) that
we've caught Bush twice telling what definitely appear
(especially by the near-universal non-reaction to them)
to be a huge 9/11(+) smoking gun truth???

Anonymous said...

Good question...very good points.

faithful forever