Friday, July 21, 2006

Pentagon Papers Author Daniel Ellsberg Says Government May Have Carried Out 9/11



Pentagon Papers Author Daniel Ellsberg Says Government May Have Carried Out 9/11Predicts Bush Regime Will Stage Terrorist Attack to Provide Pretext for Iran, Syria Invasion, And Justify Internment Camps for American People
Infowars July 19, 2006By Kevin Smith & Alex Jones
Daniel Ellsberg is a former American military analyst employed by the RAND Corporation who precipitated a national firestorm in 1971 when he released the Pentagon Papers, the US military's account of activities during the Vietnam War, to The New York Times. The release awakened the American people to a systematic program of organized deception carried out by the Pentagon against the population to continue the Vietnam War.
Daniel Ellsberg, speaking on air to GCN radio host Jack Blood, stated his concerns that criminal elements of the US government were psychologically capable to have carried out 9/11. He warned that within days after a US military strike on Iran that Bush's handlers would probably stage some type of terror attack in the West to legitimize the new war.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country."
- Daniel EllsbergAuthor, Pentagon Papers
Ellsberg went on to state that another major Reichstag-like state-sponsored attack would be followed by a martial law scenario which might include detention camps for American dissenters.
Ellsberg said that he worked with individuals at the highest levels of government who staged war provocations several times to whip up pro-war sentiment in the US. Daniel Ellsberg now joins the ranks of hundreds of prominent engineers, physicists, economists, military officers, pilots, high-level intelligence analysts, and cabinet ministers who are exposing the 9/11 hoax.
Each day more and more respected professionals are going public with their questions about the official 9/11 fable. The 9/11 cover-up dam is breaking under the weight of these truthseekers' efforts and the perpetrators of 9/11 are watching them in horror while wondering who will be the next to speak up.
Here is a partial transcript of the interview:
Jack Blood: Have you had a chance to take a look at a lot of this information coming from America’s leading scholars, physicists, engineers, etc. Who have taken a look now at 9/11 and are now, not only questioning what might have happened on 9/11, but really being very direct including a number of high level …
Daniel Ellsberg: Actually, I have looked at a lot of that, and I’ll tell you without going into it all which would take a lot of time, I find some of it very implausible and other parts of it quite solid, and there’s no question in my mind that there’s enough evidence there to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of a kind that we’ve not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, and raising the release of a lot of documents, there’s no question that (D.E. chuckles) put it this way, very serious questions have been raised, about how much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may been. Is the, is a administration capable, humanly and physiologically of engineering such a provocation?
Yes, I would say that, I worked for such an administration myself, Johnson, ah, President Johnson put destroyers in harm’s way in the Tonkin Gulf not only once, but several times, with the, with a lot of his people hoping that it would lead to a confrontation and claiming that it had. And could have resulted in the lost of many lives in the course of it. And what I’m saying now, by the way though is this, and here there’s a very strong analogy, to this day there is a controversy gone back and forth historically, as to who caused the Reichstag fire, the burning of their parliament, the Reichstag, on February 27 th 1933. Goering, at one point, the number two man in the Nazi regime, said “I set that fire”, later he denied that at Nuremberg, and I’ve noticed that the latest history suggests, that it wasn’t the Nazi’s. The point is that all this time later is there is still a controversy about that. But, what there’s no controversy about is the use the Nazi’s made of it, that very night and the next day.
J.B. Cui Bono, who benefits
D.E. February 28 th, there was a Reichstag fire decree that ended freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association, all in the Weimar Constitution, and privacy of the postal system and of communications and of telephone, what ended here to, more than we knew four years ago right after 9/11. If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country, detention camps for middle-easterners and their quote “sympathizers”, critics of the President’s policy and essentially the wiping-out of the Bill of Rights.
J.B. I know your walking very carefully here Daniel Ellsberg, but that’s pretty strong medicine and we have to look at the history of the world, governments do this, as you mentioned, governments are liars, governments are murderers, they, this is not above them, I’m sure your familiar with the Northwoods Document.
D.E. Ah yes, indeed. Yeah talking about a manufactured provocation which could have involved even the shooting down of an American or some other airliner, with American support. Yes I would say by the way, that Americans definitely play this game, I’m sure that it’s happening now.
We, I expected by the way, Bush to manufacture a kind of Tonkin Gulf incident before he went into Iraq and then I decided well I’d been wrong they didn’t feel they needed that. It is interesting that the memos that came out, in conversations between Blair and Bush, (aka The White House Memo), show that Bush was pressing for the possibility of sending over a U-2 and getting it fired on and using that as an excuse.
J.B. A U-2 painted like a U.N., ah, a United Nations airplane.
D.E. Yes, but they couldn’t do that again for sure. But, what is happening right now is that Israel is clearly seeking a generally provocative act by both Hammas and Hezbollah, which I think were not wise acts some people are applauding those in the Middle-East passing out sweets and so forth, very short-sighted I would say, a lot of innocent people are going to die as a result.
http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror
/pentagon_papers_author_gov_maybe_did_911.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's get the word out and using this golden opportunity to tell your friends, to write, call, post, etc, to all the blogs, newspapers, magazines, radio shows, TV shows, etc, so that we can start putting an end to this silence about 9/11 and to get people talking and LOUDLY. What better way than via Daniel Ellsberg? Merely his name and more than just a nod makes this a verdant grassroots turf and no longer simply a perilous mine field.
Ellsberg has set it up. Let's follow through.

Thanks to everyone that came and those that helped on Tuesday evening. You all made it a big success.There were at least 100 people there to hear the excellent and informative presentation that Rebecca Cerese worked so hard to put together.
We are growing and energized to spread the truth.

12 comments:

BLKNIGHT18 said...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/21/Sept.11.prof.ap/index.html

Teacher under fire for his Cheney-9/11 theory

BLKNIGHT18 said...

The le monde story spreads to other parts of Europe:

http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2006-07-21-bredesen-en.html

BLKNIGHT18 said...

New York Times Op/Ed on Barrett

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/23/opinion/23fish.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

BLKNIGHT18 said...

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/07/controversial-instructor-speaks-about.html

New video of Barrett being interviewed

BLKNIGHT18 said...

http://gonzomuckraker.blogspot.com/2006/07/free-movie-tonight-truth-about-911.html

interview with former Bush official, Dr. Morgan Reynolds

BLKNIGHT18 said...

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060723035503797

9/11 Truth Advocates Launch Nationwide Congressional Candidate Poll

BLKNIGHT18 said...

http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/printables/060717roco02?print=true

Vanity Fair's article on Loose Change online in text.

BLKNIGHT18 said...

On tonight's O'Reilly Factor, there will be something related to the Barrett story. I don't know if it will be a live debate or just showing clips of Barrett or what.

BLKNIGHT18 said...

http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/fullschedule.csp?timeid=212020911794

Looks like right now the L.A. sypmosium will be aired on C-span Saturday night at 8pm.

Anonymous said...

You folks are clinically ill. You are deathly afraid of terrorists (as you should be) but you believe that there is no way you
can defend yourself from them. This sense of helplessness causes you transfer the anger away from the terrorists to something you think you can control, namely GWB. Your psychosis is so deep that you refuse to acknowledge reality even when the evidence can be seen with your own two eyes (such as ignoring the pentagon security cameras that caught a few frames of the plane hitting the pentagon - easily found by google - yet alone all the surviving family members of the dead passenger victims.) You may seek shelter in the fact that there are maybe thousands (millions?) of people who agree with your hypothesis of 9-11 being an evil GWB/oil/military complex/gub-mint conspiracy. But just like pediphiles can find like-thinking people on the WWW, that doesn't mean that you are mentally stable. I'm here to tell you that you are sick in the head and need some meds or counseling. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transference for your diagnosis.

Another way out of your illness is to realize that there are way's to protect yourself from terrorists. That way is to support the nation, military, and president in the war against radical Islam. How about trying to confront the radicals in your local community that support Hezbollah and Hamas in local pro-palestinian rallys? How about working in a food bank for soldiers so that they can afford to stay in the army and fight against terrorists who want to kill you. With acts like this you can be a help to our country instead of giving aid and comfort to Osmam Bin Laden like you are doing with writing notes of support to this disturbing blog.

Jan said...

there was no plane in the pentagon video. look closely. if there were a plane, why not release the 50 plus videos that were in view of the hit? release the videos and if there is a plane, I will stop. but since there are many videos, and none have been released, it may be because there was no plane.

Anonymous said...

Of coarse you blatently ignore the few hundred motorists on the rush hour highways that morning who watched the plane drive into the side of the pentagon. Or the news footage of dozens of these peple being interviewed saying they saw an American Airlines plane hit the pentagon. I assume that you believe that all these people where agents of the conspiracy correct? Also the police officer who was close enough to it to see the shades pulled down on the plane? That cop on Nightline, he has a name, Bill Lagasse, is part of the conspiracy too right? That cop who maybe will save your america-hating self one day, you'd call him a big fat liar as he's pulling you out of a car wreck maybe some day right?

Because the pentagon hasn't released the footage of a fuzzy B/W camera taking 1 frame per second of the slurpee machine means that we should ignore the big huge pile of evidence that proves there was a plane, is that what you're saying? Did I read you right?

Let me take a wild guess, you haven't read the PM book either?