If you have been following the events surrounding 911 you have quite probably been down several "rabbit holes". What you may have been uncovering can be quite frightening. It is important to learn what the truth is because " The Truth will set you Free"
'Military plan against Iran is ready'
Predicting that Iran will obtain a nuclear weapon within three years and claiming to have a strike plan in place, senior American military officers have told The Jerusalem Post they support President George W. Bush's stance to do everything necessary to stop the Islamic Republic's race for nuclear power.
Bush has repeatedly said the United States would not allow Iran to "go nuclear."
http://www.rawstory.com/showoutarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jpost.com%2Fservlet%2FSatellite%3Fpagename%3DJPost%252FJPArticle%252FShowFull%26cid%3D1181228588702
Is US Military Command
Being Readied For Iran Attack?
Using the old tactic of releasing controversial news just before the weekend in the hope minimising attention as people set off to enjoy a weekend break, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Friday afternoon that "he will advise President Bush to replace Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.” The reason? According to Gates he feared that a contentious renomination hearing in the Senate would focus too heavily on six years of war. "I have decided that at this moment in our history, the nation, our men and women in uniform, and Gen. Pace himself would not be well-served by a divisive ordeal in selecting the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff," said Gates. Apparently President Bush took Gate’s advice.
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6704
The Pentagon shakeup, tough talk on Iran, and....look everybody, it's Paris Hilton!
The Web is buzzing tonight with new tough talk on Iran and a possible attack by the United States and/or Israel. The latest bombshell, so to speak, comes from the Jerusalem Post and is highlighted on the Drudge Report:
A high-ranking American military officer told the Post that senior officers in the US armed forces had thrown their support behind Bush and believed that additional steps needed to be taken to stop Iran.
http://www.attytood.com/2007/06/the_pentagon_shakeup_tough_tal.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Greetings,
I was recently informed about this essay while discussing 9/11 on a messageboard.
www.nistreview.org/WTC-REPORT-GREENING.pdf
This person was quoted as an expert in analyzing the collapse of the WTC towers but it contains what I regard as hilariously stupid errors. I show some of the discussion and explain what I think is wrong with his analysis here:
http://www.freethoughtforum.org/forum/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=645
It is peculiar that he is on ABC since [url=http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2279963&page=2]he is a CHEMIST!!![/url] But he is writing about physics and structural engineering.
I do however find it odd that people who say the planes didn't knock the towers down do not bring up the distribution of mass in the 110 story buildings. How many tons of steel were on the floors where the planes hit? How long would it take to heat that quantity of steel even if the temperature were high enough to weaken it? The south tower collapsed in 56 minutes, that seems a rather short time for the job.
But these buildings were designed in the 1960's. Didn't the designers have to compute how much steel and concrete to put on every level? Shouldn't the experts who say the planes did it be able to look up that information in the original documents and create a table showing the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every floor? So why don't we have that info after 6 years?
psikeyhackr
Is there a conspiracy regarding the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the towers? So why haven't we heard that in SIX YEARS? How can you analyze the physics of the impact without the distribution of steel and concrete thru the building? How many tons of steel can you heat to 1100 deg F in 56 minutes? Didn't the designers have to figure out what ot put on each level in the 1960s?
How much steel was on the 80th floor of the south tower?
Windsor Tower 131 ft x 82 ft x 348 ft tall
30 flrs of WTC 205 ft x 205 ft x 360 ft tall
There had to be enough steel on the 80th floor of the south WTC to hold FOUR Windsor Towers. But we haven't heard how much steel was on every level of the buildings in SIX YEARS.
The Windsor Tower didn't collapse in 18 hours of fire so how did all that steel weaken in 56 minutes? Don't steel the TRUTH!
WTC Impact
psikeyhackr
Post a Comment